I used to LOVE going to the
Berlin zoo. This is because that is
where I met my “secondary boyfriend” Bao Bao.
It is also where our romance blossomed and finally came to an end when Bao
Bao passed away last August. Snif. I haven’t been back since.
I always visited the zoo with my
“primary boyfriend” F, an understanding fella, since he would patiently wait
while I fawned at the panda enclosure for what must have felt like an
eternity.
F doesn’t like zoos. He thinks the most interesting species at any
zoo, in a disturbing and aggravating kind of way, is the homo sapiens. People often
tend to get quite rude and aggressive with their cameras and stick them as
close as possible to the animals’ faces, ignoring all “no photography” signs as
well as fellow humans also trying to get a glimpse of the imprisoned
creatures. This is particularly bad in
Berlin, where visitors are often permitted VERY close to the animals.
The other reason F doesn’t like
zoos is the treatment of animals. He
says it is torture to keep for example a polar bear or a cheetah – both species
used to travelling large distances in the wild – in a small zoo enclosure. While I don’t disagree with him, it does
baffle me how he, and many people who think like him, are nonetheless happy
meat-munchers. That, however, might be a
post for another day.
I must admit that for a long time
I didn’t really think much about the ethics of zoos. I just liked seeing animals. When I did think about it, I thought there
were two reasons why zoos were acceptable, both linked to the protection of
endangered species:
- Some animals have trouble conceiving in the wild and local populations have shrunk so much that genetic diversity becomes precariously limited. Zoo breeding programs, in which animals are loaned to other zoos so that they can mate with partners with a different genetic makeup, can arguably help make the worldwide population healthier.
- Zoos sensitise and educate people about animals in a way that is hard to achieve in other ways. I must admit that seeing a lion or a gorilla for the first time impressed me, even if I had previously seen them both on TV.
With my recent obsession with
pandas I have learnt that the first of these reasons is not as persuasive as I
once thought. While breeding giant
pandas in captivity, in particular in zoos, has been extremely difficult (including
Bao Bao’s failed attempts with an earlier girlfriend Ming Ming on a romantic
getaway in London), this does not mean that they don’t procreate in the
wild. They’re just shy, and who can blame them. Would you feel particularly aroused with a horde of vets and in the worst case scenario curious visitors peeping at your intimate moments...? In fact it appears that the giant panda
population is on the increase, in particular due to the Chinese government’s
efforts at enlarging reserves and creating green corridors between them. (Lots more info here.) So perhaps that is the way forward, rather
than imprisoning pandas in zoos.
The second reason probably still
remains. However, is it – on its own –
enough? While zoos give kids in
particular an opportunity to see and learn about species they would possibly
otherwise not appreciate or understand, this may not be enough to justify the
expense and cruelty of the institution.
I wonder, will zoos slowly
disappear and be just a relic we think about shaking our heads 50 years from
now?
No comments:
Post a Comment