While I have been a
sort-of-vegetarian (with a complex set of rules, as those of you that made the
mistake of asking me know, and probably hope you didn’t...) for a long time,
I’ve been playing with the idea of going more vegan in recent years, and decided
for my yearly “fast” or “detox” last year to go fully vegan as an experiment. The problem I had then, and what remains the
main obstacle for me to become more vegan* is the difficulty of it. So I was hoping to get some help when I saw
an ad for an event a local vegan organisation was holding in central Geneva,
promising to introduce plant-based products and ways to use them.
Boy was I disappointed. They had a few lacklustre cartons of soya or
rice milk on show, but the event was really not at all aimed at showing people
how to cook vegan food. It was about
making people scared and disgusted of meat.
The organisers were handing out flyers with explanations of the evils of
meat and dairy production complete with pictures, and their whole tent had a
red wrap on it with a dripping effect, in order to make it look like it was
covered in blood. Classy.
We all know already that
industrial meat production is horrendous and cruel. If you didn’t know about it, well first of
all what kind of a rock have you been living under and secondly please do feel
free to check out some easy-to-find educational videos such as this
or this online. (OK, these are filmed in the US, and the
regulations are stricter in the EU, but of course a lot of our meat comes from
outside the Union and it doesn’t take a lot to find films about European farming as well.)
I know that shock therapy works
in certain contexts – in fact in most contexts. The more shocking the better: appeal to the
instincts, not to rational analysis. Tobacco
labelling is a good example. Gruesome pictures
of cancerous mouths on cigarette packs are more effective than just health
warnings that tell you that smoking will kill you or at least give you
erectile problems.
Cynics may say that use whatever
methods work, but I think that is too blunt an approach as it assumes that the
whole target audience is homogeneous. Most
people in developed countries at least KNOW that smoking is bad for you. Shouldn’t they be told where to find help in
quitting rather than being bombarded with disgusting pictures?
Similarly, people know about the
problems with meat production, but some of them do not care (and I’m not sure
they will be won over by force feeding shocking pictures to them) and the rest
don’t know what to do about it. Tell us
how to replace dairy and eggs with plant-based products easily and ethically
and that may well have a more positive effect.
Or am I just being naive?
* I’m afraid I’ll never become
fully vegan and the reasons can be summarised in two words: ICE and CREAM.
Well, I think that you are a little bit naive! What about elgs and that kind of animals or fish you are getting from your own lakeshore? The idea is ok, but things are nor so simple, there are many possibilities to have meat or fish in a right way.
ReplyDeleteYou are of course right, mysterious pen name "Mother" ;)
DeleteEating game (=meat of hunted animals) or locally fished fish is obviously not as cruel as industrial meat production. Some people of course think that killing animals for human consumption is in any way cruel and should not be done. I respect this view, while I do not personally share it.
I think you are ignoring the difficulty of obtaining game, though. Most people do not have hunters or fishermen in their family or among their friends, and they do not live in areas where people hunt or fish. In cities game is extremely hard to find and prohibitively expensive, so it is not really an option to many people.